|
|
Clinical Significance of Serum CRP, Trypsin -2 and PAF in Early Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis after ERCP |
LIU Yu-qing; LU Qi-ming |
Gansu University of Chinese Medicine,Gansu,China 730000 |
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】To discuss clinical significance of serum CRP, trypsin -2 and PAF in early diagnosis of acute pancreatitis after ERCP. 【Methods】 A total of 108 cases underwent ERCP in the department of digestive medicine from Jan 2014 to Dec 2016 was selected as subjects. After ERCP, the patients were divided into pancreatitis group, high amylase group and control group according to the occurrence of acute pancreatitis. Amylase, CRP, trypsin -2 and PAF were detected before ERCP , 6h and 24h after ERCP . 【Results】 At 6h after ERCP, serum amylase and CRP levels of the pancreatitis group and the high amylase group increased significantly; at 24h after ERCP, serum amylase and CRP levels of the pancreatitis group continued to rise, and the high amylase group decreased, which were higher than those before ERCP,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). At 6h and 24h after ERCP, serum amylase and CRP levels of the pancreatitis group were the highest, the next was the high amylase group, and the control group was the lowest, which showed significant difference in the three groups(P<0.05). At 6h after ERCP, trypsin -2 and PAF levels of the pancreatitis group and the high amylase group increased, but decreased 24h after ERCP, which were higher than those before ERCP(P<0.05). At 6h and 24h after ERCP, serum trypsin-2 and PAF levels of the pancreatitis group were the highest, the next was the high amylase group, and the control group was the lowest, which showed significant difference statistically(P<0.01). 【Conclusion】 CRP, trypsin-2 and PAF levels increased in early stage after ERCP in patients with acute pancreatitis.CRP,trypsin-2 and PAF can be detected through clinical examination to determine whether patients are with acute pancreatitis,so as to prevent and deal with it in time.
|
Received: 05 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 邓杰,朱兵,程林,等. 血清CRP水平测定在急性胰腺炎诊断中的临床价值[J].新疆医学,2016,46(8):957-959. [2] 崔婷婷,张莉,曹建彪,等. 应用ROC曲线下面积比较血清胰蛋白酶原-2与CA199对胰腺癌的诊断价值[J].继续医学教育,2014,28(10):32-35. [3] 白延霖. 血小板活化因子在重症急性胰腺炎早期诊断中的应用[J].山东医药,2014,54(33):104-105. [4] Thaker AM, Mosko JD, Berzin TM.Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis[J].Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf),2015, 3(1): 32-40. [5] 陈小微, 洪万东, 吴小丽, 等. 治疗性 ERCP 术后胰腺炎危险因素的 Logistic 回归分析[J].实用医学杂志, 2012, 28(4): 614-615. [6] 吴嘉钏, 夏璐, 王伟, 等. ERCP 术后胰腺炎相关因素的研究进展[J].国际消化病杂志, 2015, 35(3): 206-209. [7] 郑扬, 向正国, 李科军,等. 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术后并发胰腺炎的相关危险因素分析[J].医学临床研究, 2013, 30(2):297-300. [8] 宁雪金,王洪健. 尿淀粉酶、尿肌酐及尿胰蛋白酶原-2在急性胰腺炎临床诊断中的应用分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015,35(15):2223-2224. [9] 李顺君,左玥,王方建. 血清淀粉酶、血脂肪酶、尿淀粉酶、尿胰蛋白酶原-2检测在急性胰腺炎早期诊断中的临床价值[J].实用医院临床杂志,2013,10(6):161-163. [10] 徐克群,薛乐宁,龚燕芳,等. 急性胰腺炎大鼠抵抗素、CRP、IL-1β和TNF-α水平的变化[J].南京医科大学学报:自然科学版,2010,55(6):827-831. [11] 刘明剑,李文娟. 检测血钙、血糖、CRP和HCT水平对重症急性胰腺炎评估的意义[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(31):346-347. [12] Detopoulou P, Nomikos T, Fragopoulou E,et al. PAF and its metabolic enzymes in healthy volunteers: interrelations and correlations with basic characteristics[J].Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat,2012,97 (1-2):43-49. [13] Sirangelo I, Irace G, Balestfieri ML. Amyloid toxicity and platelet-activating factor signaling[J].J Cell Physiol,2013, 228(6): 1143-1148. [14] 高立生,刘宁宁,王青雷,等. 急性胰腺炎患者血中血小板活化因子、肿瘤坏死因子-α、C反应蛋白水平[J].中国老年学杂志,2013,33(3):663-664. |
|
|
|