|
|
Clinical Analysis of Different Surgical Incisions in the Treatment of Breast Fibroma |
FANG Tan-wei, FENG Rui-fa |
Department of Breast Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College, Guilin 541100, China |
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】To explore the therapeutic effect of different surgical incisions for breast fibroma. 【Methods】 A total of 320 patients with breast fibroma were enrolled in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016. The patients were divided into control group and study group according to the random number method. The former was treated with radial incision, The operation time, bleeding volume and postoperative complication rate were compared between the two groups. 【Results】 The total effective rate was 80.0% in the control group and 100.0% in the study group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The operation time was (43.16 ± 3.08) min in the control group and the intraoperative blood loss was(125.83±7.42)mL.Operative time was(20.84±2.67) min and the blood loss was (6.27±1.46) ml in study group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The complication rate was 11.9% in the control group and 3.75% in the study group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 The operation of ring-areola incision in the treatment of breast fibroma is better. It can reduce the operation time, blood loss, improve the clinical curative effect and reduce the complication. It is suitable for clinical application.
|
Received: 09 October 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 彭艺,汤枫.不同手术切口类型对乳腺纤维瘤术后甲级愈合率及并发症的影响[J].当代医学,2016,11(20):110-111. [2] 黄梅霜,胡寿祥.乳晕旁单切口行乳腺多发良性肿块切除术的临床价值[J].中国医药科学,2016,9(14):114-117. [3] 贾宝全.经腋前线单切口腔镜辅助乳腺纤维瘤手术与常规手术的比较[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志(电子版),2016,2(6):1609-1610. [4] 黄锡冰.环乳晕切口治疗乳腺纤维瘤的临床效果研究[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2016,10(21):404-405. [5] 刘晓萍.微创手术治疗乳腺纤维瘤的围术期护理措施探究[J].中国医学指南,2016,12(16):329-330. [6] 李庆,潘永优,刘小丽.不同手术切口治疗乳腺纤维瘤的临床疗效观察[J].中国医药指南,2014,28(11):187-188. [7] 吴坚.经乳晕缘弧形切口切除乳腺纤维腺瘤临床观察[J].中国医药指南,2014,33(9):90-91. [8] 金恩斯别克?孜亚,黄善波.乳腺纤维瘤手术治疗的必要性及方法探讨[J].中外医学研究,2015,10(8):77-78.
|
|
|
|