Abstract [Obj ective]To compare the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs.conventional ultrasound in preoperative diagnosis and clinical stage of cervical cancer.[Methods]Totally 50 patients with cervical cancer con-firmed by pathology were analyzed retrospectively.The diagnostic results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and con-ventional ultrasound were analyzed and compared.[Results]The detection rate of contrast-enhanced ultrasound was 84.0% which was markedly higher than that of conventional ultrasound(50.0%),and there was significant difference(P<0.05).There was significant difference in the detection rate between grade Ⅰ and grade Ⅱ cervi-cal cancer(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between gradeⅢ and gradeⅣ(P>0.05).The le-sion size and invasive range of cervical cancer measured by contrast-enhanced ultrasound was obviously larger than those measured by conventional ultrasound,and there was significant difference(P <0.05).[Conclusion]Con-trast-enhanced ultrasound can improve clinical diagnostic rate of cervical cancer,and is superior to conventional ul-trasound in preoperative diagnosis and clinical stage of cervical cancer,so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
YANG Bi-yun%LI Hu-yi%YIN Hui. Comparative Study of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound vs.Conventional Ultrasound in Preoperative Diagnosis and Clinical Stage of Cervical Cancer[J]. 医学临床研究, 2014, 31(6): 1068-1070.
2014, Vol. 31 
