|
Abstract [Objective]To compared and analyze the efficacy of sustaining plate(SP)vs.locking plate(LP) for the treatment of tibial plateau fracture.[Methods]A total of 44 patients tibial plateau fracture were col-lected.Among them,19 patients underwent SP internal fixation(SP group),while 25 patients underwent LP internal infixation(LP group).The age,gender,inj ury status,type,operation time,blood loss,postoperative wound drainage volume,length of hospital stay,healing time of fracture and the rating results of knee joint function in 2 groups were compared and analyzed.[Results]There was no significant difference in gender con-stitution,average age,the combined inj ury,fracture type,hospitalization time and postoperative drainage vol-ume between two groups(P>0.05).Compared with LP group,intraoperative blood loss was more,and op-eration time and healing time were longer in SP group.The good and excellent rate in LP group was markedly higher than that in SP group(92.00% vs.78.94%),and there was significant difference(P<0.05).[Con-clusion]LP for the treatment of tibial plateau fracture is better than SP.The main indexes are intraoperative blood loss,operation time,healing time of fracture and knee joint function score,etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014, Vol. 31 
