Abstract：【Objective】 To study the curative efficacy of minimally invasive intracranial pressure monitoring probe in implantation of severe craniocerebral trauma and its significance. 【Methods】 The clinical data of 40 patients with severe craniocerebral trauma treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different monitoring methods of ICP, It was divided into observation group (with minimally invasive implant probe) and control group (routine general anesthesia borehole implantation monitoring probe) with 20 cases in each group.According to the monitoring results, the patients were given corresponding treatment and followed up for a period of one year after the treatment. Glasgow prognosis score (GOS), NIHSS, complications and death were compared between the two groups. 【Results】 In the observation group, the operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume were (13.47 ±3.58) min, (65.21 ±6.11) mL,significantly lower than those in the control group (36.68 ±2.62) min, (97.43±12.63) mL, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in GOS,NIHSS score between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the GOS score of the two groups was higher than that before treatment ,and the observation group was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The NIHSS score of the two groups was lower than that before treatment(P<0.05). The NIHSS score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was 25.00% (5 / 20), which was significantly lower than that in the control group (60.00%,12 / 20). The difference was statistically significant(χ2=5.013,P=0.025<0.05). The total mortality of patients in the observation group was 20.00% (4 / 20) which was significantly lower than that in the control group (50.00% 10 / 20), and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=6.241,P=0.013<0.05).【Conclusion】 In the treatment of severe craniocerebral trauma patients, the microinvasive intracranial pressure probe implantation can also accurately monitor the intracranial pressure in patients, and has the advantages of reducing operation time, reducing trauma, simple operation and fewer complications, etc. It can also improve the prognosis of patients and reduce the mortality rate, which is worthy of clinical application.
周海, 滕宏伟, 周静, 仇劲松. 微创颅内压监测在重型颅脑外伤治疗中的应用[J]. 医学临床研究, 2018, 35(9): 1686-1689.
ZHOU Hai, TENG Hong-wei, ZHOU Jing, et al. Curative Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Probe in Implantation of Heavy Head Trauma. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 35(9): 1686-1689.
[1] 吴彬,张宁,李志强,等.颅内压监测对颅内血肿术后治疗的指导价值[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2015,53(4):92-96. [2] 张金梁,姜春秀,杨静然,等. 两种方法治疗去骨瓣减压术后硬膜下积液的对比研究[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2016,13(5):96-98. [3] 许鹏程,邵雪非,陶进. CT对创伤性颅脑损伤评价及预后评估的研究进展[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2015,42(3):257-260. [4] 邓现语,周林,陈宋育,等. 重型颅脑损伤救治指南第四版(中文翻译版)[M].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志,2016,2(5):1-96. [5] Behmanesh B, Bartels M, Gessler F,et al. Noninvasive transfontanelle monitoring of the intracerebral pressure in comparison with an invasive intradural intracranial pressure device:a prospective study[J].Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown),2017 ,13(5):609-613. [6] So JS, Yun JH.The combined use of cardiac output and intracranial pressure monitoring to maintain optimal cerebral perfusion pressure and minimize complications for severe traumatic brain injury[J].Korean J Neurotrauma,2017 ,13(2):96-102. [7] Teplan M, Bajla I, Rosipal R, et al. Feature clustering of intracranial pressure time series for alarm function estimation in traumatic brain injury[J].Physiol Meas,2017,38(11):2015-2043. [8] 李春伟,伊志强,李良. 重型创伤性颅脑损伤的治疗进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(7):656-660. [9] 龙明. 两种颅内减压术和二次脑损伤因素对老年重症颅脑损伤预后及脑代谢能力的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2016,36(24):6198-6200. [10] 舒艳婷,许峰,唐林林,等. 持续有创颅内压监测在创伤性脑损伤患儿中的应用价值[J].重庆医科大学学报,2016,41(12):1280-1283. [11] 王文磊,许峰,李芳. 有创颅内压监测在儿童重型颅脑创伤中应用价值的研究[J].重庆医学,2017,46(20):2755-2757.
2018, Vol. 35 
