A Comparative Study of Therapeutic Effects and Safety Among Small Bone Flap Craniotomy, Traditional Craniotomy, Repanation and Drainage in Patients with Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage
ZHU Xing-quan, WU Qing
1st Department of Surgery, the People's Hospital of Chongqing Shapingba District, Chongqing 400030
Abstract：【Objective】To compare and analyze the therapeutic effects and safety of small bone flap craniotomy, traditional craniotomy, repanation and drainage in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.【Methods】The clinical data of 150 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage treated in our hospital from June 2012 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed and patients were divided into group A (63 cases), group B (30 cases), group C (57 cases), according to the different treatment methods. Patients in the group A were treated with small bone flap craniotomy, patients in the group B were treated with traditional craniotomy, and patients in the group C were treated with trepanation and drainage. Then the curative effect, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, GSS, ADL score and prognosis of the three groups were compared and analyzed.【Results】The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in the group B were higher than those in the groups A and C (P<0.05); The operation time in the group A was longer than that in the group C (P<0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss and the hospitalization time of the group A and the group C had no significant difference (P>0.05). GSS scores of the three groups at 3 months post-operation decreased, while ADL scores increased (P<0.05); The GSS scores in the group A were higher than those in the group B and C at 3 months after operation, and the ADL scores in the group A were lower than those in the group B and C (P<0.05), moreover no significant difference was found in the GSS and ADL scores between the group B and the group C at 3 months post-operation (P>0.05); The total incidence of postoperative complications in the group B was significantly higher than that in the group A and the group C (P<0.05), while no significant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative complications between the group A and the group C (P>0.05); The good prognosis rate of the group B was significantly lower than that of the group A and C (P<0.05), with no significant difference between the group A and the group C (P>0.05); The total effective treatment of the group B and C was slightly higher than that of the group A, but there was no statistical difference between the three groups (P>0.05).【Conclusion】The comparison among small bone flap craniotomy, traditional craniotomy, repanation and drainage shows that each treatment has its own advantages and disadvantages, the application should combined with patient's condition.
朱星全,吴庆. 小骨窗开颅术、骨瓣开颅术和钻孔引流术治疗高血压脑出血临床疗效及安全性对比分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2018, 35(4): 675-678.
ZHU Xing-quan, WU Qing. A Comparative Study of Therapeutic Effects and Safety Among Small Bone Flap Craniotomy, Traditional Craniotomy, Repanation and Drainage in Patients with Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 35(4): 675-678.
2018, Vol. 35 
