瘢痕子宫再次妊娠并发前置胎盘的临床特点及预后分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2017.07.005

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要【目的】分析瘢痕子宫再次妊娠并发前置胎盘的临床特点及母婴结局,探讨其干预措施。【方法】以本院2015年3月至2017年3月收治的174例前置胎盘产妇为研究对象,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。按照产妇是否存在瘢痕子宫,将其分别纳入瘢痕子宫组(观察组,n=81)及非瘢痕子宫组(对照组,n=93),比较两组产妇临床特点及母婴结局,分析瘢痕子宫再次妊娠并发前置胎盘对母婴预后的影响。【结果】两组产妇年龄、入院孕周、前置胎盘类型、前置胎盘位置等一般临床资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),观察组孕次高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组产妇术前无痛性阴道出血发生率、平均产前阴道出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。两组产妇均经剖宫产终止妊娠。观察组手术时间、产后出血量高于对照组,其术中输血率、宫腔填塞纱布率、胎盘附着面缝扎率、胎盘植入率、背包缝合率及子宫切除率亦高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);观察组新生儿早产率、窒息率、死亡率略高于对照组,但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。【结论】瘢痕子宫再次妊娠并发前置胎盘的临床特点与单纯前置胎盘类似,但对产妇结局的影响较单纯前置胎盘更为严重,应注重积极主动地对其干预,确保母婴安全。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王瑞霞
	魏玲
	何建花

关键词 ：瘢痕, 子宫, 妊娠, 前置胎盘, 预后

Abstract：【Objective】To analyze the clinical features, mother and infant outcomes of scar uterus re-pregnancy complicated with placenta previa, and to explore the intervention measures. 【Methods】 A total of 174 cases with placenta previa treated in our hospital from March 2015 to March 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the existence of maternal uterine scar, the patients were included in the uterine scar group (study group,n=81) and non scar uterus group (control group,n=93). The clinical characteristics and maternal outcome, the impact of uterine scar pregnancy complicated with placenta previa on maternal and neonatal outcomes in each group were analyzed. 【Results】 There was no significant difference between the two groups in the general clinical data such as the age of the pregnant women, the gestational age of admission, the type of placenta previa and the location of placenta previa (P＞0.05). The pregnancy rate of observation group was higher than that of control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The incidence of painless vaginal bleeding and the average amount of vaginal bleeding before operation in two groups were not statistically significant (P＞0.05). Two groups of pregnant women were terminated by caesarean section. The operation time and the amount of postpartum hemorrhage in the observation group were higher than those in the control group. The rate of intraoperative blood transfusion, the rate of intrauterine gauze filling, the rate of placental attachment, the rate of placenta accreta, the rate of suture and the rate of hysterectomy were also higher than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); Premature birth rate of newborn, asphyxia rate and mortality rate of the observation group were slightly higher than that of the control group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P＞0.05).【Conclusion】The clinical features of scarred uterus secondary to placenta previa are similar to those of simple placenta previa, but its effect on the outcome of the m aternal is more severe than that of the simple placenta previa. Therefore, attention should be payed to active intervention to ensure the safety of mother and baby.

Key words： Cicatrix Uterus Pregnancy Placenta Previa Prognosis

收稿日期: 2017-06-19

PACS:

R714.56

基金资助:河北省科技计划项目(编号:10276126)

引用本文:

王瑞霞,魏玲,何建花. 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠并发前置胎盘的临床特点及预后分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2017, 34(7): 1261-1264,1266.
WANG Rui-xia, WEI Ling, HE Jian-hua. Clinical Features and Prognosis of Scar Uterus Re-pregnancy Complicated with Placenta Previa. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 34(7): 1261-1264,1266.

链接本文:

http://www.jcr.net.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2017.07.005 或 http://www.jcr.net.cn/CN/Y2017/V34/I7/1261

[1] Fylstra D L. Hysteroscopy and suction evacuation of cesarean scar pregnancies: a case report and review[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2014, 40(3): 853-857.
[2] Khan S, Singh KN, Ghanghoriya V. An unusual case of haemoperitonium and bladder invasion due to placenta percreta in the third trimester mimicking threatened uterine rupture[J].Int J Reprod, Contracept, Obstet Gynecol,2016, 5(2): 556-558.
[3] 彭方亮, 罗欣, 漆洪波. 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠并发前置胎盘 197 例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2016, 32(8): 788-791.
[4] Shrim A. Asymptomatic expulsion of a fetus through cesarean section scar in the presence of invasive placenta previa[J].Case Rep Perinat Med, 2015, 4(1): 1-3.
[5] Timor‐Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2014, 44(3): 346-353.
[6] 马红柳.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠并发前置胎盘 73 例母婴结局分析[J].现代医药卫生, 2016, 32(14): 2123-2125.
[7] Timor‐Tritsch I E, Monteagudo A, Cali G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2014, 43(4): 383-395.
[8] 方有珍. 疤痕子宫合并前置胎盘的分娩结局分析[J].西南军医, 2014, 16(2): 155-156.
[9] 王清云, 邹萌. 彩色超声诊断疤痕子宫合并前置胎盘并植入的临床观察[J].中国继续医学教育, 2014, 6(5): 99-101.
[10] 范翠芳, 孙艳梅, 董兰, 等. 前置胎盘伴疤痕子宫的母婴结局——附 253 例临床分析[J].重庆医学, 2015, 44(7): 946-948.
[11] Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Gilbert S, Landon M B, et al. Placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment[J].Obstet Anesth Digest,2014, 34(1): 20-21.[12] 江静颖. 胎盘附着部位对凶险性前置胎盘妊娠结局的影响及高危因素分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志, 2014, 13(23): 1981-1984.
[13] Silver R M. Abnormal placentation: placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta[J].Obstet Gynecol,2015, 126(3): 654-668.
[14] Comstock CH, Bronsteen RA. The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta[J].BJOG,2014, 121(2): 171-182.
[15] 侯倩男, 常林利, 周辉. 凶险型前置胎盘中胎盘主体附着位置对母体预后的影响[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志 (电子版), 2014, 10(1): 74-77.
[16] Vahanian SA, Vintzileos AM. Placental implantation abnormalities: a modern approach[J].Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2016, 28(6): 477-484.
[17] 杨红兵, 舒丹, 张利, 等. 凶险型前置胎盘剖宫产 28 例临床分析[J].海南医学, 2014, 25(16): 2373-2375.
[18] 陈艳雅. 瘢痕子宫合并前置胎盘的高危因素与临床危害[J].临床医学工程, 2015, 22(2): 170-171.
[19] Zosmer N, Fuller J, Shaikh H, et al. Natural history of early first‐trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2015, 46(3): 367-375.
[20] Sumigama S. Uterine sutures at prior caesarean section and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancy: a case-control study[J].BJOG,2014, 121(7): 866-875.