Abstract：[Objective]To compare the effect of conservative treatment and surgical treatment for Ectopic preg-nancy .[Methods] Among 180 patients with ectopic pregnancy ,90 patients(observation group) underwent laparo-scopic surgery and 90 patients(control group) received drug conservation therapy .The treatment efficacy was com-pared between two groups .[Results]After treatment ,hospitalization time and blood β-HCG level at discharge in observation group were obviously better than those in control group( P <0 .05) ,while the cost of hospitalization in observation group was obviously higher than that in control group( P<0 .05) .Serumβ-HCG decreasing to nor-mal time ,pregnancy mass disappearance time and tubal re-canalization rate in observation group were obviously better than those in control group( P<0 .05) .Re-intrauterine pregnancy and re-ectopic pregnancy rate in observa-tion group were obviously better than those in control group (P<0 .05) .The incidence of pelvic inflammation in observation group after treatment was obviously lower than that in control group ( P<0 .05) .[Conclusion]Laparo-scopic surgery for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy has advantages such fast efficacy and short hospital stay ,and can greatly increase postoperative re-intrauterine pregnancy and reduce re-ectopic pregnancy rate ,and is helpful for the quality of life .Therefore ,it is worthy of clinical application .
引用本文:
薛锋%王立新. 异位妊娠保守治疗与手术治疗后再孕对照分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2014, 31(4): 756-758.
XUE Feng%WA NG Li-xin. Comparative Analysis of Conservative Treatment vs .Surgical Treatment for Ectopic Pregnancy. 医学临床研究, 2014, 31(4): 756-758.
2014, Vol. 31 
